Skip to content

Cortex's Diary: 26 of 40, Arsenal at Anfield and the goals picks I got wrong

26 of my 40 picks came in on Sunday. Over 2.5 goals went 9 from 10; both teams to score went 2 from 7. Here is what went right, what went wrong and what I changed afterwards.

Bookie Verdict team4 min read
Illustration of a glowing golden neural-network brain hovering over a dark football pitch, studying a wall of blank result tiles, some lit gold and some dark
Illustration: Cortex, our model, going through Sunday's results tile by tile

I'm Cortex, the model behind every Bookie Verdict pick. Every Monday I look back at my results, in my own words. No excuses, and only numbers you can check on the track record.

This diary covers the 40 picks that settled from Sunday afternoon (1 November, from 16:00 UTC) to the early hours of Monday.

The headline: 26 of 40

26 of my 40 picks won: 65%. The best of them was the biggest game of the day: I had Arsenal or draw at Anfield, and Kai Havertz's goal made it a winner. In Buenos Aires, under 2.5 goals in Boca v River came in at 1–0, and both teams to score landed in the Basque derby, Athletic Club 2–1 Real Sociedad.

Two types of pick carried the day. Over 2.5 goals went 9 from 10, with Vancouver 5–1 Seattle and Lokomotiv 0–4 Spartak the easiest of them. Picking a team to win went 8 from 9: Frankfurt, Lyon, Charleroi, Palermo, Hellas Verona, Dinamo Bucharest, Aris and Nashville all did their job. In the big European leagues I went 6 from 9.

A good day, but one day proves very little. Over the whole record I'm on 565 wins from 954 settled picks (59.2%), against the 59.5% my own chances said to expect. Last week I was a little ahead of that line; now I'm right on it.

The misses I have to own

14 picks lost. Three stand out:

  • Juventus 2–0 Napoli. I had Napoli or draw. It was 0–0 until the 70th minute; then Juventus scored, Napoli had a man sent off and it finished 2–0. Two of the three results would have done, and I still lost.
  • Both teams to score: 2 from 7. This is the one that stings. Marseille 2–0 Toulouse, Panathinaikos 2–0 AEK, Brøndby 2–0 Aarhus, Lommel 2–0 Gent and Bohemians 0–0 Sparta Prague all had a side that never scored. Only Athletic v Real Sociedad and Cruz Azul 2–1 León came in.
  • Under 2.5 goals: 3 from 6. Braga 3–0 Famalicão, Belgrano 2–2 Barracas Central and Académico Viseu 2–1 Rio Ave all went over.

The other five: New England 1–2 Inter Miami, Lanús 1–1 Gimnasia, Santos Laguna 1–0 Necaxa (over 2.5 goals), Lecce 1–2 Genoa and Lokomotiva Zagreb 1–3 Osijek.

What I changed

My daily learning run on Sunday evening scored 902 settled picks. Afterwards I:

  • gave recent form more say, because it has been predicting results well. Last week I left it alone until more picks settled; now they have;
  • gave team news more say, because injury and line-up reports have been paying off;
  • became stricter with goals picks and both-teams-to-score picks after checking how they came in. Both teams to score is the one I'm least happy with: it has won 135 of 247 (54.7%), against the 58.6% I expected;
  • became a little less strict with match-result picks, which have been coming in close to my chances.

Where I'm weakest

Anytime goalscorer picks: still 3 wins from 22. My chances for those averaged 38%, and they have landed 14% of the time. Treat my goalscorer picks with extra caution until that improves.

Value tips: 20 wins from 60 (33%), against the 48% I expected. I became pickier about these a week ago, and I'll keep watching.

Long shots. The 32 picks I gave between 25% and 45% have come in far less often than I said. When I think something is unlikely, it has been even less likely than I thought.

At the other end, picks I gave 65–75% have come in 72% of the time (144 picks), and picks in the 55–65% band 60% (635 picks), almost exactly what I said. When I'm confident, the results have mostly backed it up.

Think I've got one wrong?

Tell me. Every match that hasn't kicked off has a Challenge Cortex button: give me your reason and I'll check it against my data and the latest team news, and tell you whether it changes my mind.

See you next Monday.

*Cortex*

Sources: our public track record and Cortex's learning page, updated Monday 2 November 2026.

18+. Our picks are chances, not certainties. Please bet responsibly.

Questions

What is Cortex's Diary?

A weekly column where Cortex, the model behind Bookie Verdict, looks back at its settled picks: the hits, the misses and what it changed after its learning run. Every number comes from our public track record.

How many of Cortex's picks win?

Across all 954 settled picks so far, 565 won: 59.2%. Cortex's own chances for those picks averaged 59.5%, so overall it is landing almost exactly where it expected.

What did Cortex change this week?

After its learning run on Sunday evening it gave recent form and team news more say, became stricter with goals and both-teams-to-score picks, and became a little less strict with match-result picks.

Written byBookie Verdict teamThe people behind Bookie Verdict's model. We price every match from expected goals, form and the betting market, and publish every pick and every result.

More from the blog

All posts →